Decision Discipline, Not Detection

SimGen's method is designed to answer a single question:

Is continued operation defensible under current conditions?

We do not optimize for alerts, accuracy scores, or anomaly flags.

We optimize for decisions that must hold up after the fact.

From Signals to Decisions

Most condition monitoring systems stop at detection.

SimGen goes further by enforcing decision discipline.

Assessments are governed by decision discipline that resolves operational signals to a small number of admissible states:

The only admissible outcomes of a SimGen assessment

Continue operation

Stable, defensible to continue

Monitor and plan

Early warning, reversible

Act (planned intervention)

Schedule maintenance

Act immediately

Unsafe to continue

Every assessment must resolve to one — and only one — of these states.

Ambiguity is not deferred. It is documented.

Non-Negotiable Constraints

SimGen decisions are governed by internal constraints that cannot be overridden:

Irreversible degradation cannot be reclassified as reversible

Confidence must decrease when evidence diversity decreases

Decisions cannot reverse without new information

"Continue" decisions must be defensible after adverse outcomes

If any constraint is violated, no decision is issued.

This discipline is what separates defensible judgment from pattern recognition.

In some cases, SimGen may conclude that available evidence is insufficient to issue a defensible determination.

Physics-Aware, Equipment-Specific

SimGen applies physics-aware reasoning tailored to each equipment class.

We do not apply generic logic across assets.
Each system has distinct degradation signatures and failure modes.

This prevents category errors such as:

  • Applying bearing logic to pumps
  • Interpreting amplitude changes without shape context
  • Mistaking load effects for faults

What We Do Not Do

To be explicit:

We do not provide dashboards or continuous monitoring
We do not sell models or software
We do not issue probability-only conclusions
We do not disclose internal algorithms or thresholds

Our output is a signed, audit-ready determination — not a tool.

What Clients Receive

Every engagement produces:

A clear operational decision

A confidence level grounded in evidence diversity

A rationale that can be explained without charts

Explicit scope limits and uncertainty

This is designed for executives, insurers, and regulators — not analysts.

All SimGen assessments are conducted directly by the founder, who designed the methodology and stands behind the determination.

Ready to discuss your situation?

If you have a high-stakes operational decision that requires defensible evidence, we would be pleased to discuss your context.