Metrics increase with degradation. This pattern is characteristic of bearing faults where vibration energy, spectral indicators, and stability loss progress together.
| Operator | Current Value | Baseline | Change | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMS Energy | 2.34 g | 0.82 g | +185% | ELEVATED |
| Spectral Kurtosis | 8.7 | 3.2 | +172% | ELEVATED |
| Negentropy | 0.94 | 0.31 | +203% | CRITICAL |
| Envelope Kurtosis | 12.4 | 4.1 | +202% | CRITICAL |
| Operator | Value | Threshold | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROR (Regime Occupancy Ratio) | 0.58 | 0.50 | Operating in degraded regime >50% of time |
| PNR (Point of No Return) | Not crossed | 25% | Reversible. Distance to threshold: 18.2% |
| SDI (Signed Degradation Index) | 0.47 | 0.50 | Approaching critical threshold |
r = 0.23
No concerning correlation with load or temperature.
14,400 samples analyzed
No gaps or anomalies detected.
TYPE A directionality confirmed.
All operators moving in expected direction.
Rationale: Current stability margin (43.2%) places this asset in the INVESTIGATE zone. While the Point of No Return has not been crossed, continued degradation at the observed rate would cross the PNR threshold within 2-3 weeks. Intervention now enables planned maintenance vs. emergency response.
This assessment evaluates operational defensibility under observed conditions. It does not replace OEM design limits or safety interlocks. The determination is based on vibration data collected from the asset-mounted accelerometer and analyzed using SimGen's physics-based stability operators.
What this report does NOT include:
This report focuses on operational defensibility and decision support.
Detailed diagnostic plots and raw sensor analytics are available in the
technical appendix when required.